Message from Bill Cole 11/9/2009 Message from Bill Cole 11/9/2009 Dear Friends,
For anyone toying with the idea of actually reading the US Congress' 2000-page
Health Care proposal, but who may feel somewhat intimidated by its almost
biblical length, might I suggest you "think local and work up to the task"
by reading the 35-page Minutes from the Board of Selectmen's 6 October Workshop.
I assure you, if you can survive this "breathtaking display of mindless blather"
the US Congress' document will be a piece of cake.
Most of us recall when CNN first came on the scene with its revolutionary "24/7"
approach to news broadcasting. Any time of day or night you could turn on your
TV and get the news of the day...in an almost continuous loop.
Fast forward a few decades and our very own Selectmen have now introduced us to
their unique version of "24/7 coverage" - no, not the news, but rather,
Hudson's home grown "continuos loop"...the Bensons property.
Turn on your TV, go to Hudson's public access channel, and there you'll find the
Selectmen...24/7...rambling on and on about Bensons...Bensons...Bensons.
For those who feel they may not up to the task of reading through 35 pages of
utter nonsense, the following should give you the sensation of actually having
been there.
SELECTMAN #1 Please note that the only item on tonight's agenda is Bensons.
SELECTMAN #2 Surprise! Surprise! What's next? Catholic elected Pope!
SELECTMAN #3 I'm very passionate about Bensons. But, I demand respect!
SELECTMAN #4 Hard opening!!! Soft opening!!! It's so difficult to decide.
SELECTMAN #5 I love SOFT ice cream...my favorite is "Passion Fruit"
SELECTMAN #3 No one is more passionate about Bensons than me...never...ever!
I demand respect!
SELECTMAN #2 Would it make sense to have a PLAN?
SELECTMAN #4 Won't a PLAN just get in the way?
SELECTMAN #3 Go ahead...just try and be more passionate about Bensons than me
- I dare you! And while you're at it...how about some respect!
SELECTMAN #5 When do we get the elephants and camels? Sure hope we have
those funny little horseys with the stripes.
SELECTMAN #1 I was informed today that we are running out of roofs to repair
out at Bensons.
SELECTMAN #4 How about a Warrant Article for MORE buildings...with roofs!
SELECTMAN #1 You mean like a Senior Center?
SELECTMAN #4 Senior Center! Is it election time already?
SELECTMAN #2 What about a Life Style Center?
SELECTMAN #4 How about a casino...with a HARD opening!
SELECTMAN #5 Will they have cotton candy?
SELECTMAN #1 Is that a phone I hear ringing?
SELECTMAN #3 You want passion about Bensons, I'll give you passion about Bensons
...but I still demand respect...excuse me a moment...
I HAVE to take THIS call!
Painful? You can only imagine!
While the Police Department continues to be both understaffed and experiencing
significant personnel turbulance, the Selectmen continue to debate the distinction
between a "hard opening and a soft opening" (as if anyone could possibly explain
what those terms are supposed to mean in the first palce?).
While the Fire Department's requirements for additional trained personnel and
adequate (and safe) facilities continue to be ignored, the Selectmen continue to
disagee on the need for rules regulating the Benson's property's use.
While basic services continue to be put on the back burner, the Selectmen continue
to commit more and more Town assets and taxpayer dollars in support of the
convaluted project Benson's has now become.
By any standard of effective governing, the Selectmen - having now appointed
themselves THE BENSONS COMMITTEE - appear to have not only lost their focus
...but also their "collective" mind.
Warmest wishes to you and yours for a blessed and safe Thanksgiving.
As always, with best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 8/19/2009
Dear Friends,
I just returned from a brief business trip overseas.
When I departed on Tuesday (11th), the Benson Park project was merely
a chaotic and out of control disaster waiting to happen.
Back in town on Sunday (16th) - and following a review of the HLN and
returning a number of related phone messages - it became painfully
apparent that the Benson Park project now finds itself on the very edge
of an abyss.
Translation: the entire project is now but one last gasping breath away
from a total implosion into an organizational and managerial “black hole”
created and nurtured by the Board of Selectmen.
Having patted themselves on the back for securing the Benson’s property
from the state, the Selectmen were faced with actually accomplishing
something.
A task for which the Board (collectively and on the individual level) has
repeatedly demonstrated an inability to achieve:
a. The dedicated members of the former Benson’s Committee were summarily
dismissed in favor of a “new” committee.
b. This “new” committee, in its search for internal focus and Board of
Selectmen support, has found neither.
c. The Board’s liaison to the “new” committee offered / threatened to
resign several weeks ago.
d. At the Board’s 11 Aug meeting two members decided to take him up on
the offer.
e. The Board’s liaison quickly served notice that the “offer” was no longer
“valid” - I’m put in mind of a Macy’s “one day only” sale flyer rather than
a demonstration of responsible municipal governing.
f. Other board members are reduced to constantly “looking skyward” as
if in search of divine intervention.
g. An acrimonious (and, front page) contract dispute with a Benson Park vendor.
h. Public disrespect towards the lady who continues to be the very "heart and soul"
of the Bensons property.
...and the list goes on!
g.
Bottom line my friends: the current Selectmen are not equipped - in terms of
temperament and/or management (…and leadership) skills - to effectively work
with the “new” committee.
The “implosion” (from which there will be no return) may well be under way.
If, on the other hand, the Benson Park project can at least maintain its position
even on the edge of the abyss, I would suggest the following course of [immediate]
action.
Simply, that the Board of Selectmen identify and appoint a qualified former Selectman
to serve as its [non-voting] liaison to the Benson Park committee (and others, as appropriate).
A former Selectman would allow for the process to be maintained and implemented at the
“governing body” level; as a non-voting liaison, this former Selectman could effectively
serve as an “honest” broker between all parties…thereby improving the possibility of
effective coordination and mission accomplishment.
The Board’s “appointed liaison” should have the following characteristics and qualifications:
- Honesty and integrity
- Demonstrated leadership skills and managerial expertise
- No financial interests (past, present or anticipated) whatsoever, in the Town
(to include family and/or business associates)
- A record of dedicated and outstanding service to the town as a Selectman
- Firsthand knowledge of and involvement in the Benson’s property “saga” over the years
- Single-minded focus on "mission accomplishment"
If the Selectmen will identify such an individual...and convince that individual to take
on the mission...there's every reason to believe that something worthwhile can be salvaged
for our community.
But, if the Selectmen continue down a path cluttered with rampant egos and self-interest,
their failure (and its long-term negative impact on the community) is all but assured.
As always my friends I sincerely hope this finds all well with you and yours
- and enjoying the long awaited "summer" weather.
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 3/4/2009
Dear Friends,
Question:
What do Esther McGraw, Rhona Charbonneau, Jeremy Griffus,
Duane King, Ray Parker and Carol Pomphret have in common?
Answer:
As it stands right now, none of them will be members of what is
being marketed as a "New and Improved" Benson's Committee currently
under construction by the Board of Selectmen.
In an attempt to see if it can screw up everything it touches, the Board
of Selectmen - with its version of "throwing out the baby with
the bath water" - has decided to discard these dedicated citizens who
have labored long and hard on behalf of the Bensons project over the
last decade or more.
Rather than recognize the outstanding contributions these individuals
have made, by offering them "carryover" membership to this "new"
committee - thus allowing them to continue their efforts on behalf of
the community - the Board of Selectmen summarily (...and, without
hesitation) simply did away with the existing committee.
But, under the heading of "rubbing salt in the wound" the Board of
Selectmen has graciously "invited" them to "apply" for membership to the
NEW committee.
Of course there's no guarantee that any of them would actually be appointed.
So, why have these outstanding citizens apparently decided not to accept
the Selectmen's magnanimous offer?
While I don't know for certain, I think it's safe to assume that the
Selectmen's lack of respect and appreciation for the contributions these
folks have made - and, were prepared to continue making - can
rightfully be inferred as nothing less than a slap in the face...and an
affront to the individual pride each of these individuals have in their
commitment to our community.
Think about it dear friends, Esther McGraw - the very heart and soul
of Benson's since the beginning...the only person who could be counted
on to hang in there year after year, regardless of the roadblocks the
state and local government put in her path - has been pushed aside and
discarded...without a second thought.
It would be more than appropriate to ask just how this could happen -
how could Hudson's governing body managed to sink to such depths.
Only the Selectmen can tell us - though I suspect that the truth might
well inhibit their response:
But, a few distinct possibilities do come to mind:
1. Since the state finally turned over the Bensons property to the
town, everybody and his [proverbial] brother has rushed forward to take
credit.
2. People who until a few months ago couldn't find Bensons with a GPS
now tell us they are the reason "things worked out" with the state.
3. People who worked against the project - all the time professing
their support - now want to take charge of its future.
4. An on-going struggle for control of the Board of Selectmen between
two of its members - while the other three stand by on the
sidelines...little more than casual observers.
5. A lack of "class" on the part of the Board of Selectmen -
making casulties of hard working, dedicated citizens whose only crime
was in wanting to make their community a better place.
One last thought while I'm on the subject of "class."
Would the Board Chairman please take a page out of the "old west"
playbook and require the Selectmen to "check their cellphones at the
door" before entering into the Board chamber.
As amusing as it is to witness a Selectman get a cellphone call (in the
middle of a meeting...on live TV) with marching orders and instructions
from his "higher headquarters" - it only serves to highlight an
absolute lack of respect for the governing process.
As always my friends, my warmest wishes to you and yours.
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 3/4/2009
Dear Friends,
One last item before the March 10th Town elections.
I respectfully request and would truly appreciate your support for my
"write in" candidacy for the 3-year term on the Code of Ethics
Committee.
Hudson's Code of Ethics Committee is an elected 5-member body.
At present there are only two members on the committee.
There are 3 positions to be filled at the March 10th elections (3,2 & 1
year term positions, respectively) - there are no candidates
formerly signed up and appearing on the ballot for any of these terms.
I have always believed - and especially now, during the uncertain
times we face - that a viable and creditable Code of Ethics Committee
is a critical adjunct to the effective conduct of local government.
Other than the property taxes I pay each year, I do not have - nor
have I ever had - any financial interest and/or dealings with the
town of Hudson.
I have never worked for the Town, nor has any member of my family ever
worked for the Town.
In short, I have no conflict of interest or even the perception of any
conflict of interest which would disqualify me from serving as a member
of the Code of Ethics Committee.
My years in public service (Town Council, Board of Selectmen, Planning
Board, etc) have given me the experience with and knowledge of town
government that will allow me to make a meaningful contribution and
provide the much needed leadership presently missing from the Code of
Ethics Committee.
If you agree and are willing to give me your trust for the next 3 years,
I would sincerely appreciate your support at the polls on March 10th:
Code of Ethics Committee
Three Year Term
Bill Cole ("write in")
Thank you in advance for your support - with best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 3/1/2009
Dear Friends,
What do the numbers 5, 13, 16 and 17 have in common?
Winning lotto numbers? Maybe!
Winning "quick pick" combination? Possibly
Warrant Articles that must be VOTED DOWN at the March 10th Town Elections?
Yes...without hesitation.
These Warrant Articles provide a breathtaking combination of the ridiculous with the downright distasteful.
Just what are these Articles and why should you vote NO the moment you enter the voting booth?
Article 5 Are you in favor of the adoption of Amendment No. 4?
Amend the Official Zoning Map by rezoning of land known as Tax Map 228, Lots 052, 053 and 054 (inclusive),
and the land which constitutes Lowell Road and abuts the aforementioned properties from being in the
Residential-Two (R-2) to being in the Business (B) District. Said parcels are located at the intersection
of Rena Avenue
and Lowell Road. (Disapproved by the Planning Board by a vote of 5-2.)
As was mentioned in a previous "...developing thought" this is nothing more than a clumsy and painfully
transparent attempt to influence the value of "someone's" land at the expense of and with absolutely
no regard for the people of south Hudson or the community as a whole.
Even the Planning Board was able to agree that this was not in the community's best interest.
Article 13 Part-Time Senior Services Director
Shall the Town of Hudson vote to raise and appropriate the sum of $23,391 which represents the cost
of wages, benefits and office supplies necessary to hire a part-time Senior Services Director?
Once again it's time for the Board of Selectmen's yearly "let's pretend to do something for Hudson's
seniors and hope they don't catch on that we really don't care" magic show.
Hudson needs a Town engineer.
Hudson needs a Code Enforcement Officer / Zoning Administrator.
Hudson needs a fully-manned Robinson Rd fire station.
Hudson needs vacant Police Department positions filled.
What do the Selectmen offer us...?
...this make-believe position to implement a non-existent plan supporting an unidentified goal.
Article 16 Future Senior Center Capital Reserve Fund
Shall the Town of Hudson vote to establish a Capital Reserve Fund under the provisions of RSA 35:1
for the purposes of purchasing, building, leasing or renting a facility for a Senior Center to be
known as the "Senior Center Capital Reserve Fund" and to raise and appropriate the sum of $50,000
to be placed in said fund?
You've just got to feel warm and fuzzy about this Article. That is , until you realize that nothing
worthwhile will ever happen until the entire senior population of Hudson tires of being played the
fool by Town officials.
Until such time as Hudson's seniors stop letting themselves be repeatedly manipulated by vote-seeking
politicians this charade will continue to be played out...year after year after year.
Votes should be earned as a result of demonstrated merit - not on the backs of and with the
hard-earned dollars of the taxpayers.
Article 17 Fire Station Land Assessment
Shall the Town of Hudson vote to raise and appropriate the sum of $25,000 to conduct an assessment
of certain parcels of land within the NH Route 102 corridor to determine whether those parcels would
be suitable for the location of a future fire station facility?
This year's "crème de la crème" in the category of "Board of Selectmen irresponsibility and gross
incompetence"
While the Article eludes to "certain parcels" in point of fact the bulk of the funds would only be
spent of one particular piece of privately-owned property.
This particular piece of property has already been determined to be totally unsatisfactory in every
category (topography, drainage, sewer, roadway access, etc.)
required for the construction and operations of a fire station facility.
Maybe it's just me, but the fact that the Board of Selectmen want to waste $25,000 of taxpayers'
hard earned money to assess someone else's property simply
to get an answer they already have raises a number of very disturbing questions.
Or, as Father McGee, our pastor when I was growing up back in Niagara Falls would say, "...something
stinks to high heaven."
The above is yet another painful example of just what Hudson's "5 shepherds" have in store for the
"flock."
So, dear friends, unless you think it's a wonderful idea to simply throw away $23,391,
$50,000 & $25,000 just remember the numbers: 5, 13, 16 & 17...and vote NO!
Don't let March 10th come and go without your voice being heard!
Truly appreciate your taking the time to consider the above. I expect to send out one more "
...developing thought" prior to the elections, I hope you will give it the same consideration.
As always, I sincerely hope this finds you and yours well.
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 2/25/2009
Dear Friends,
Just a reminder that the Town elections will be held on Tuesday, 10
March (7AM-8Pm) @ the Hudson Community Center (formerly Lions Hall).
On the "off chance" that anyone might be interested in my thoughts with
regard to the Board of Selectmen races, I respectfully offer the following.
While we may well be suffering from "change" fatigue (following the 2
year runup to the last presidential election) I would ask your
indulgence this one more time.
The Board of Selectmen is well overdue for a "change".
The Board, over the last 2-3 years, has demonstrated a level of
ineffectiveness and irresponsibility unequaled during the 20+ years
I have been observing and involved in town government.
This is not opinion - this is documented fact.
Aside from the awarding of a contract for trash pickup, the Selectmen
- with their countless hours of chatter and meaningless posturing - have
accomplished nothing with regard to preparing Hudson for the uncertain
future it faces.
Fortunately, "change" is as close as the voting booth on March 10th.
There are two (3-year) vacancies and one (1-year) vacancy being
contested on March 10th - I would respectfully request your
consideration of and support for:
Marilyn McGrath: 3 year term to the Board of Selectmen
Maryellen Davis: 1 year term to the Board of Selectmen
Both Marilyn and Maryellen have continually demonstrated an unselfish
dedication to our community through their many years of outstanding
public service. They bring a unique level of professionalism, experience
and a sincere concern for the well being of their fellow citizens - qualities
which have been sadly lacking on the Board of Selectmen for a number
of years now.
Marilyn's 20+ years of service (Planning Board, Zoning Board of
Adjustment, Town Council, etc.) is unmatched as an example of
what it means to be a volunteer public servant. Marilyn's
unswerving commitment to Hudson's well being, often in the face of
powerful special interests, stands in testament to the moral courage
and community focus she will bring to the Board of Selectmen.
Maryellen's 5 years as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment
(ZBA) confirms, even for the casual observer, her intelligence, her
ability to successfully analyze and resolve even the most complex of
issues impacting our town and, a work ethic always focused on what is
best for our community. A proven professional in the private sector,
Maryellen will bring a track record of success and acheivement to the
Board of Selectmen that will ensure our community being well served in
the coming years.
Again, I respectfully request your support for both Marilyn McGrath
and Maryellen Davis on election day.
If we ever hope to have any chance of ridding ourselves of the inertia
which has taken hold of the Board of Selectmen, the election of these
two outstanding fellow citizens and proven public servants is
imperative.
While the elections on March 10th do not have the surface visability of
a Senate or Presidential race, make no mistake with regard to their
importance to each of us and our community in the years to come.
PLEASE!!! Take the time and make the effort to get out
and vote on March 10th...
As always, my best regard to you and yours.
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 2/16/2009
Dear Friends,
A few random thoughts to take us into Spring:
Here's a [hypothetical) quiz:
Question #1: A public official is pulled over by the police.
The public official should:
(a) Be cooperative with and towards the police officer...
(b) Repeatedly point out he's a public official,
and how special that makes him...
Question #2: A public official finds himself at police headquarters.
The public official should:
(a) Be cooperative with and towards police department
personnel...
(b) Threaten to have the police department's budget
reviewed...
Call me old fashion, but anyone choosing (b) for either or both questions
is simply too stupid to be
a public official.
It would appear that the possible development of the Green Meadow property
is, after a self-imposed hiatus, once again the "headline grabbing" story of
choice for local newspapers.
With the possible exception of the Green Meadow Board of Directors and the
local newspapers' advertising sales departments it seems somewhat premature
- by about 5 years, give or take - for anyone to actually get excited (either way)
about the prospect of casino gambling coming to our fair community.
(Memo to Hudson seniors: don't cancel your contract for bus transportation to Foxwood)
Under the heading of "creative revenue-generating" schemes, hats off to the
Board of Selectmen.
At the Town's Deliberative Session on 7 Feb, it was suggested that IF
(yes...all caps) a new fire station is ever built, the current Central
Fire Station might best be turned into a "parking garage"
(...a "park 'n ride" for the commuter train service the newspapers keep
telling us is "a done deal"???)
I'm only sorry it's too late to get an Article added to this year's Town
Warrant to hire a "parking lot attendant."
And, lastly my friends.
Have you noticed of late the increased use of the term "Good Shepherd"
by politicians, government officials and others we believe are looking
out for our best interest?
The Good Shepherd reference is of course meant to put us in mind of the
stoic herdsman, braving the elements to keep his flock together and safe
from the dangers of the wild.
All well and good for biblical parables, nursery rhymes and campaign bumper
stickers...but, the warm and fuzzy feeling tends to crumble when you stop
(...if only for the briefest of moments) and remember just what the final
"destination" of the "flock" really is.
As always my friends, I truly hope this finds you and yours well.
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 2/08/2009
Dear Friends,
For those who have finished reading the Sunday papers, may I suggest
you go to the NH General Court website and check out
House Bill (HB) 593-FN-A:
"...authorizing the licensing and construction of destination
resorts with gaming facilities...2 destination resorts in the
northern tier of the state...1 destination resort in the southern tier
of the state"
Included in the more interesting parameters for the "southern tier" facility:
a. must have an 18-hole golf course
b. must have a minimum of 150 acres
Is it just me, or does this remind you of something familiar
("price check on aisle 9" replaced by "place your bets.").
If you are wondering as to why there has been no mention of this
House Bill (that I am aware of) in our local newspapers or from our
elected state representatives...you're not alone.
As always my friends, I truly hope this finds you and yours well.
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 1/27/2009
Dear Friends,
As a follow up to a previous developing thought, at its 7 Jan 09 meeting the
Planning Board voted to disapprove the proposed rezoning - from R2 to business
- of the 3 lots at Lowell Rd./Rena Ave.
While the official (and legitimate) reason for the Planning Board's disapproval
was its concerns regarding the future possibility of a commercial driveway accessing
Rena Ave., the Planning Board is to be commended for its refusal to go along with
this painfully transparent attempt to simply maximize the potential value of the property
- at the very real expense of the surrounding area.
As to why the New Life Christian Church would allow itself to be associated with this
remains a "devine mystery."
Although NOT supported by the Planning Board, this petition warrant article will STILL
be on the ballot at this year's Town Meeting. Please support the Planning Board...and
yourselves - VOTE NO!
Speaking of Town Meeting, there are 3 Selectmen seats up for election on Tuesday, 10 March.
The 3 incumbents (Selectmen Nadeau, Coutu and Jasper) have already announced that they
will be running for re-election.
While I commend their willingness to continue serving in a position which often fails
to win its occupant any "popularity contests," I only wish that Selectman Jasper had
not felt compelled to use his announcement of candidacy as an opportuniy to disparage
the honorable service of those who have served on previous Boards of Selectmen and
the Town Council.
If Selectman Jasper wants to believe that the current Board is the most effective to
have ever served, that is his right - although, I would hasten to remind Selectman
Jasper that opinions vary in this regard (i.e. His self-serving assessment is not
supported by the facts).
But, to vilify the honest and dedicated service of previous town officials, some sadly
no longer with us, in an attempt to validate his candidacy - and that of his fellow
incumbents - is nothing less than the act of a desperate individual sadly lacking
in both personal and professional class.
Information concerning all positions to be filled at the next election is available on
the Town's website or by contacting the Town Administrator's office (881-6024); the deadline for filing is 4PM on Friday, 30 Jan.
As always, I truly hope this finds each of you well - and surviving what has become
a rather tedious winter season (weather-wise).
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 1/12/2009
For those of you who may have missed the press reports, the Town of Hudson
- after almost a decade of state-generated / bureaucratic “blood, sweat and tears”
- officially took possession of the Benson’s property from the NH Department of
Transportation.
A great many people, past and present, contributed to the realization of this milestone,
and as such deserve the sincere thanks of a grateful community for their hard work.
But, for anyone who ever came in contact with the “Benson’s property” project, the one
single and overarching reason for and the "driving force" behind the community’s final
success in this effort resides in the selfless commitment of Ether McGraw.
For those who may not be familiar with Esther she is - to be precise and with the
deepest admiration and respect - nothing less than a sheer “force of nature" comprised
with equal parts of personal charm and steely determination.
Her demonstrated dedication to the Benson’s project and her ability, over the years,
to stay the course - when those with faint hearts or other motives were advocating
that the town forget about the property…and just give up - establish and confirm
Esther credentials as the #1 supporter of our community...without equal...without reservation.
Now, just what should be done with the Benson’s property?
From every person who has been involved, to any degree, over the years, I feel certain
you would get a different answer.
There is a “Master Plan” that was put together 7-8 years ago - as such, it might
well serve as jumping off point for discussion. How valid it is today, in light of the
final agreement Hudson now has with the NHDoT, I have no idea.
Which brings me to what I suggest the town should do / be focused on right now:
First
If it has not yet been done, the final agreement between Hudson and the NHDoT
should be posted to the town’s website. That way, as we move forward, the residents
/ taxpayers will know exactly what the basis is of decisions they may / will be asked
to support.
Second
Conduct an in-depth assessment of the entire property to determine its current status
with regard to the possible presence of any hazardous waste as a result of a series of
unfortunate and/or negligent activities previously carried out by a contractor working
for the NHDoT. If any such materials are found to still be on the property they must be
removed before any other work proceeds.
This is imperative because (a) such materials present a clear and inescapable health
risk to our citizens and, (b) since Hudson has now taken on the responsibility as the
“deep pocket”, from the perspective of any future litigation, such materials present a
clear and inescapable financial risk to the taxpayers.
That aside, the acquisition of the Benson’s property offers us a unique opportunity and
represents a new beginning in the development and attainment of an enhanced quality of
life for our entire community in the years to come.
Thanks again to Ether and all those who have contributed in any way to the Benson's
property acquisition.
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 1-1-2009
Dear Friends,
For those of you who may have missed the press reports, the Town of Hudson
- after almost a decade of state-generated / bureaucratic “blood, sweat and tears”
- officially took possession of the Benson’s property from the NH Department of Transportation.
A great many people, past and present, contributed to the realization of this
milestone, and as such deserve the sincere thanks of a grateful community for
their hard work.
But, for anyone who ever came in contact with the “Benson’s property” project,
the one single and overarching reason for and the "driving force" behind the community’s
final success in this effort resides in the selfless commitment of Ether McGraw.
For those who may not be familiar with Esther she is - to be precise and with
the deepest admiration and respect - nothing less than a sheer “force of nature"
comprised with equal parts of personal charm and steely determination.
Her demonstrated dedication to the Benson’s project and her ability, over the years,
to stay the course - when those with faint hearts or other motives were advocating
that the town forget about the property…and just give up - establish and confirm
Esther credentials as the #1 supporter of our community...without equal...without reservation.
Now, just what should be done with the Benson’s property?
From every person who has been involved, to any degree, over the years, I feel certain
you would get a different answer.
There is a “Master Plan” that was put together 7-8 years ago - as such, it might
well serve as jumping off point for discussion. How valid it is today, in light of the
final agreement Hudson now has with the NHDoT, I have no idea.
Which brings me to what I suggest the town should do / be focused on right now:
First
If it has not yet been done, the final agreement between Hudson and the NHDoT should
be posted to the town’s website. That way, as we move forward, the residents / taxpayers
will know exactly what the basis is of decisions they may / will be asked to support.
Second
Conduct an in-depth assessment of the entire property to determine its current status
with regard to the possible presence of any hazardous waste as a result of a series of
unfortunate and/or negligent activities previously carried out by a contractor working
for the NHDoT. If any such materials are found to still be on the property they must
be removed before any other work proceeds.
This is imperative because (a) such materials present a clear and inescapable health risk
to our citizens and, (b) since Hudson has now taken on the responsibility as the “deep pocket”,
from the perspective of any future litigation, such materials present a clear and
inescapable financial risk to the taxpayers.
That aside, the acquisition of the Benson’s property offers us a unique opportunity and
represents a new beginning in the development and attainment of an enhanced quality of life
for our entire community in the years to come.
Thanks again to Ether and all those who have contributed in any way to the Benson's property
acquisition.
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 9/28/2008
Queridos Amigos,
Saludos desde la ciudad de Hudson!
Welcome dear friends to New England's one and only "Banana Republic."
This designation was earned for the community by our very own junta (a.k.a. Board of
Selectmen) who, at the end of their 2 September meeting, voted to continue their
systematic dismemberment of effective municipal operations - this time under the
euphemism of "Town Hall re-organization."
With that vote, the junta's two dueling “commandantes” - supported by the other members
of the “revolutionary council” and cheered on by the Planning Board’s resident
“Evita” (“…don’t cry for me…”) - finally realized their long-held dream of removing
the Director of the Community Development Department (Sean Sullivan).
With all its stammering about "re-organization" the junta's latest assault on effective
government amounted to nothing less than the painfully amateurish and transparent
"firing" of a long-serving, dedicated and trusted town employee.
As I am sure each of you appreciates, when you fire someone, it's always helpful to
have a legitimate reason for taking such drastic action.
From our junta's perspective there were two valid reasons to fire Sean Sullivan.
But, our junta had one small - not insignificant - problem.
Put simply, the uncomfortable questions which would arise if it made the two reasons
public.
Thus, our junta's lame recourse to the "Town Hall re-organization" cover story.
What, you may well ask are Sean Sullivan's shortcomings?
Quite simply, Sean Sullivan is both highly competent and honest.
For 8 years, in service to the Hudson community, Sean demonstrated a unique ability to
effectively lead and consistently accomplish any and all missions assigned to the
Community Development Department.
In addition, Sean repeatedly stood firm in the face of pressure being exerted by local
hack politicians attempting to bully him into actions that would be in the best
financial interests of their constituents (read: cronies) but detrimental to Hudson.
Competence & Honesty: two characteristics which the junta could no longer tolerate.
So where does that leave us?
Some observations:
A. As a result of the junta's shabby and malicious treatment, an outstanding public
servant must now pick up the pieces of his professional career and provide for his
young family under difficult circumstances.
These predictable results were apparently of little or no concern to those who receive
a steady paycheck, pension or allowance.
B. The Town is now in the market to hire someone called an "Assistant
Town Administrator”
The duties of this position are: (1) supervise/oversee operations related to Planning,
Engineering, Zoning Enforcement & Inspectional Services and (2) filling in for the
Town Administrator when he is out of the office.
With regard to (1):
Is it just me or didn't the junta just "fire" an individual with 8 years of
solid and demonstrated experience doing exactly what is required in this 'new"
position - and possessing a stronger resume than is presently being sought
in perspective candidates.
With regard to (2):
The current Town Administrator, with the exception of annual vacation, is
hardly ever out of town or out of contact with Town Hall. Besides, he has two
outstanding executive assistants more than capable of keeping Hudson's "ship of state"
afloat when he is away.
C. Speaking of vacancies to be filled, with Sean Sullivan's "firing", the junta is now
faced with filling 4 key positions, within the town operations structure:
* Police Chief (Chief Gendron will retire effective 31 Dec 08)
* Town Engineer
* Code Enforcement Officer / Zoning Administrator
* Assistant Town Administrator (see above)
How challenging will this be for the junta?
Here is only one example which should suffice to provide you with more than a few
sleepless nights.
Two years ago, this junta (with one exception) spent 5 torturous meetings attempting
to resolve the breathtakingly difficult issue of granting a license for a "seasonal
hot dog stand" in Hudson. They never actually accomplished the mission. And, by the
time they "threw in the towel and gave up trying" the "summer hot dog selling season"
had come and gone.
The junta's appointment of the town's - one must assume fully employed - Building
Inspector/Health Officer to the position of "interim" Zoning Administrator is a
meaningless ploy by the junta to direct attention away from its systematic destruction
of the Community Development Department.
D. With the exception of the Police Chief, the continued vacancy of the other three
positions is cause for serious concern.
If the Town - that's you and me, my dear friends - is to have ANY chance at surviving
in the ruthless land use and property development arena, then these three positions
are critical.
One potential bright spot on the horozon may be found in Selectman Coutu. Although he
voted with the junta in the Sean Sullivan matter, I am willing to give him the benefit
of the doubt that his vote was the result of having been "sold a bill of goods" by his
fellow Selectmen.
From my observations of Selectman Coutu thus far, I find him to be a decent man and a
well-meaning public official. I truly hope he is able to stay the course and that in
doing so my impression holds true in the long run.
In closing my friends, don't let the tranquil transition from summer to fall lull you
into a false sense of security.
When it comes to land use and development issues facing our community, be assured that
the "barbarians are STILL at the gate."
Vaya con dios amigos,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 9/12/2008
Dear Friends,
The New Hampshire Municipal Association (NHMA) conducted its 2009-2010 Legislative
Policy Conference today, up in Concord.
In preparation for the conference, NHMA requested that each town send a voting delegate
to the conference to represent the town’s views on a variety of policy proposals being
put forth by the NHMA for the upcoming session of the state legislature.
In response to the NHMA’s request (Selectman Massey is Hudson’s representative), the
Board of Selectmen, at its 26 August meeting, addressed several of the NHMA’s proposals
that Selectman Massey is expected to cast a vote “for” or “against.”
Of special interest and significance is:
******“An amendment to RSA 72:28, IV (a) to allow all veterans residing
in the State of NH with an honorable discharge to qualify for the
Standard and Optional Veterans’ Tax Credit, regardless of whether
they served their country during the qualifying wars and armed
conflicts currently listed or received the required medals.”*******
For those who may be unaware, there has (for a great many years) been a “stain” upon the
reputation of NH's State Legislature stemming from the Legislature’s contrived segregation
of ALL honorably discharged members of the US Armed Forces into two basic categories: (1)
those who should be respected for their service and (2) those who should not.
This self-inflicted wound to our state’s honor came about as a result of the Legislature’s
dishonorable creation of a “phony” difference between service performed during a designated
period of “war or armed conflict” (i.e. Korean War, Vietnam, Desert Storm) as opposed to
military service during “peacetime” (i.e post-WWII, post-Korean War, etc.).
Ignoring the one and only “box to be checked” - honorable service in the US Armed Forces
- the Legislature has created an ego-serving mythology of a “warrior” caste.
Believe me when I tell you that our state legislators (with one or two rare exceptions)
have little or no first hand experience when it comes to “warriors” or the sting of battle
- save for their tendency towards combat operations when it comes to securing parking spaces
up in Concord or the last piece of cream pie in the statehouse cafeteria.
Based on my 21 years of active duty service in the US Army - during wartime and peacetime
- here, dear friends, is the reality of service in the US Armed Forces during periods having
an official “war or armed conflict” designation.
During such a designated period, the majority of the men and women honorably serving in the
Armed Forces never actually have occasion to or are called upon to serve in the area of
combat operations.
And of those troops who actually serve in a combat environment, 90% NEVER hear a shot
fired…let alone engage in combat with the enemy.
The Legislature’s creation of a “warrior” caste is the result of nothing less than dishonesty
on the part of some legislators and ignorance on the part of others.
But let us return to the Hudson Board of Selectmen - and its “marching orders” to Selectman
Massey for today’s conference.
In the America I hold dear, one would expect nothing less than absolute and unanimous support
for the NHMA’s policy proposal regarding equal treatment for ALL honorably discharged veterans.
However, consider the current edition of the Board of Selectmen.
Let’s begin, though, with a positive.
Selectman Coutu was steadfast in his appreciation for their service and his support for the
men and women of the US Armed Forces. He echoed the sentiments of every right-thinking American
in this regard.
It is unfortunate, and just a little bit sad, that such sentiments on the part of a town official
stand out as an “exception” rather than the “rule.”
Chairman Nadeau simply agreed with Selectman Coutu, while introducing the possibility of Town
Meeting reducing the current $500 exemption to something less.
Certainly not the kind of “hard core” support needed to overcome the Legislature’s demonstrated
hostility towards some veterans.
Selectman Maddox, following his own internal “focus group” and after determining which way the
“wind was blowing” for the TV audience, “guessed” he’d go along with Selectman Coutu.
If I had to “guess” I’d say that Selectman Maddox’s support for veterans is situational-dependent
at best.
Selectman Massey - himself an honorably discharged veteran - wandered back and forth between the
cost of additional veterans qualifying for a tax exemption and the obvious injustice of the current
legislation.
In the end, while he personally supports the status quo, he reluctantly cast his vote in support
of the NHMS’s proposal.
Again, veterans presently not eligible for the tax exemption can draw no comfort from such
disingenuous support.
Last, but certainly not least, we come to Selectman Jasper. For those who have followed his career
and witnessed his evolution from a “young man of promise” to simply a man “who makes promises,”
it was not surprising that he reduced the sacred issue of service, commitment and dedication to
an unseemly and pathetic rendition about the fanciful financial impacts of the proposal.
Using “made up” numbers - left unchallenged by any of his fellow Board members - Selectman Jasper
prophesied financial doom for Hudson is any more honorably discharged veterans (as a result of
For those who wrap themselves in the shroud of fiscal responsibility as a defense against any and
all noble and worthwhile human endeavors, here’s a bit of good news.
Since the vast majority of any “additional” veterans qualifying for a tax exemption would come
from the ranks of post-WWII / post-Korean War / post-Vietnam honorably discharged veterans, the
insurance industry’s actuarial tables point to any financial impact being [sadly] short-lived.
That should make them feel better, don’t you think.
But I digress - back to Selectman Jasper.
His convolutions about veterans who “actually saw combat” versus those who “didn’t actually see
combat” versus those “who just served” brought tears to my eyes. No, not tears of sadness but
rather of abject laughter - the kind of laughter one experiences while listening to a child try
to explain all the reasons why his or her hand got caught in the cookie jar.
His comment to the effect that “most of these people will get more money on a tax credit than
they earned in the service by the time they are done” was a vile insult to all members of the
US Armed Forces.
A couple of final observations:
1. This was one of the more disturbing “civics” demonstrations this Board has ever put on - even
by its standards.
2. While the Board’s “consensus” went forward with a 4-1 vote, if a “real” vote were ever required
of this Board, Selectman Coutu would, I assure you, be “alone.”
3. It’s almost painful to watch politicians once noted for being able to seamlessly talk out of
both sides of their mouths at the same time being reduced to stammering hypocrisy.
4. If the above is any indication of this Board's mindset, we may all want to start paying closer
attention to what our town officials are up to. Or, be prepared for some very nasty surprises.
As always, I truly hope this finds each of your well.
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 8/2/2008
Dear Friends,
“Irony” made yet another appearance in Hudson recently.
The Board of Selectmen, at its 22 July meeting, continued
with its attempt to come to grips with the economic realities resulting
from the ever increasing cost of fuel. How to best manage and most
effectively expend taxpayer dollars set the underlying tone of the meeting.
While the very next evening, the Planning Board, at its meeting,
decided to continue its ritualistic commitment to wasting the taxpayers’
hard earned money and Town resources.
That right my friends, the Green Meadow Golf Club, Inc. was allowed
to make yet another appearance before the Planning Board.
How many times has this “non-applicant” been “invited” back by the Planning
Board over the last 12–16 months? I’ve lost count!
Under the highly questionable category of “design phase review”
- a legalistic “shell game”
- Green Meadow Golf Club, Inc has been
allowed to come back before the Board, again and a again.
With absolutely nothing of substance to offer
- aided and abetted by a Planning Board whose members’ continuing affection
for the sound of their own collective voice was once again on display
- Green Meadow Gold Club, Inc. again served up an equal measure of “mumbo-jumbo”
and more “baloney” than you’ll find at lunch time on a construction site.
With what can only be described as complete indifference to
the experienced and professional advice of the Town Planner
- in effect to send Green Meadow Golf Club, Inc. on its way until
such time as it has a viable and believable plan for submission to the Town
- the Planning Board successfully avoided any contact with responsible behavior
and “sent” the Green Meadow folks to the Board of Selectmen.
What the Selectmen’s part in this “morality play” is at this
juncture remains a mystery.
We can only hope that the Selectmen will not be intimidated or feel compelled
to further placate Green Meadow Golf Club, Inc
- the Town has already
wasted enough time and resources indulging the “Green Meadow development”
fantasy.
“Memo” to the Planning Board:
Rather than waste time with childish references to “highways” or “parkways”
being named after your members, try to focus on keeping future development
in Hudson from resembling a "dead-end road."
If the last few years have taught you nothing else, it is that the “people”
do pay attention to what goes on within the Hudson community
- a painful reality check awaits anyone who is foolish enough to think
otherwise.
As always, I truly hope this finds all well with you and your families.
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 7/11/2008
Dear Friends,
With apologies to Dr. Seuss…
“Yes, I’m back once again - still wandering ‘round,
So, this time I thought - I’ll offer you “BROWN”
“But, if BROWN is confusing - causing pain in your head,
Just give me a moment - I’ll change it to “R
“If RED feels too harsh - and you’d rather be mellow,
I’m sure in my bag - I’ll find you some “YEL
“With so many colors - you’ve already seen,
I just can’t remember - have I offered you “GREEN”?
“BLUE” “BLACK” and “ORANGE” - whatever you say,
Mix them together - looks somewhat like “GRAY”
“I would offer to you - even the “KITCHEN SINK”
As long as you know - it comes only in “PINK”
“POP” Quiz:
“Which of the following is scheduled to be on the Agenda for the
Planning Board’s 23 July meeting?”
(a) The Cat in the Hat
(b) Horton
(c) The Grinch
(d) Green Meadow Golf Course, Inc
(e) All of the above
As tempting as it is to answer (e), the correct answer, for those
who have been paying attention in class, is (d).
Yes, dear friends, Green Meadow, Inc. is back yet again.
Not with anything new mind you.
Since W/S bailed out over a year ago, Green Meadow, Inc. has been
allowed to subject the town to a painful and seemingly endless series
of “wild guess - hope for the best - what’s your favorite color”
appearances before the Planning Board.
Why, you may ask, do they keep coming back before the Planning Board?
The simple answer is “because they can.”
The more important - and potentially embarrassing - question is.
“Which public officials (certainly not limited exclusively to the
Planning Board) continue to support and enable Green Meadow, Inc.,
thus extending a “shelf life” that expired with W/S’ departure from
our community in 2007?”
Since the “rational thought” approach no longer appears to be operative,
we are left with only two possibilities:
1. Public officials whose skewed sense of fair play and utter fear
of offending Green Meadow, Inc’s sensibilities has created a mutated
strain of public service.
2. Public officials who speculate that they may secure a measure of
personal gain from a large-scale, future development.
To the former, I would suggest that if they want to “teach the world to
sing in perfect harmony” that they pay for the Coca Cola with something
other than taxpayer funds and Town resources.
And, to the latter, I would caution that the days of “sweetheart” deals
for officials with “hometown pedigrees” are over - trust me.
So, what are we to do?
Here’s a [developing] thought.
I have no idea how much the Green Meadow property is worth.
Back in the W/S days the figure of $93 million was often heard. Recently,
I believe one of our Selectmen made reference to a number in the mid-$100
million range.
What I do know is that there is a difference between value and worth (in the
financial arena not in the abstract).
Value is what the property is currently assessed at.
Worth, on the other hand, is what someone is actually willing to pay for the
property.
If I am correct in my understanding, then it would appear that the Green Meadow
property's present worth is questionable.
All of which would explain why Green Meadow, Inc. keeps coming back to the
Planning Board - again and again and again.
With the Planning Board’s continued willingness to waste taxpayer money and
Town resources serving as a backdrop, Green Meadow, Inc. has no incentive to
adhere to the established process & procedures (full-scale traffic and environmental
impact studies, infrastructure assessments, etc.) that have, for many years, applied
to similar applicants coming before the Board.
Reality being what reality is, I would offer the following recommendation for
serious consideration - from my perspective, it’s the only one that makes
any logical sense while at the same time benefiting both our community and
Green Meadow, Inc:
a. Green Meadow Inc. donates the entire property to the Town of Hudson.
--- While I am not an accountant I would suspect that the resulting corporate
and/or individual tax benefits would be significant.
b. The Town of Hudson takes over the golf operations (18 or 27 holes rather
than the current 36+).
--- Contrary to what you will hear running a golf course, successfully,
is not that difficult.
c. The remainder of the property to be utilized for community-wide recreation
(facilities and activities).
--- Although community-oriented, focus would be on youth programs and
opportunities for the elderly (all the town’s elderly, not simply the members
of a private club).
--- Would require an enhanced and structured Recreation Department
--- Truly hope that everyone is having an enjoyable and safe summer.
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 6/23/2008
Dear Friends,
The recent “groundbreaking” for Hudson’s new library presents us with a
unique opportunity to “get it right.”
No, I’m not referring to the new library; that will take care of itself.
The two-part opportunity we now have - critical in nature and actually
important to Hudson’s future - is centered on the town’s ability to provide
effective Fire Department and Town Hall support and services.
“Central” fire station (Library St.):
---> A disaster, not one waiting to happen but rather,
one that already has.
---> The conditions under which our firefighters are forced
to operate within this facility, and the facility itself are
beyond deplorable.
---> These conditions present a real time safety hazard to
the personnel working there, with the resultant negative
impact on the department’s overall effectiveness and ability
to provide required fire services to the community.
Town Hall (School St.):
As a facility tasked with supporting, on a daily basis,
a wide variety and increasing volume of often highly-sensitive transactions
(between the town and its citizens, the business community, social services
organizations, as well as other municipal and governmental agencies), it is
literally bursting at the seams.
---> Its present utility is at best questionable
---> Its future viability, non-existent.
With regard to the “central” fire station component, the Board of Selectmen recently
approved the formation of an “ad hoc” building committee.
Given the less-than-sterling results attained by other “Selectman ad hoc” committees
over the last few years - when combined with the very public dissension exhibited
by the Selectmen concerning the committee’s actual “charge” (just what it is the
committee is being tasked to accomplish) - the probability that this committee
will be allowed to make any meaningful contribution to a resolution of the issue is,
at best, minimal.
Even more unsettling than the formation of a committee working without a clear and
definable objective, is the fact that at the Selectmen’s 10 June meeting the
possibility that the town might go out and “buy” land for a new “central” station
was raised by a Board member.
Word on the “Hudson street” is that at least one Board member has already engaged
in such discussions with a local land owner in this regard.
If true, this is not only disturbing but also highly inappropriate and probably
in violation of state statutes governing the behavior and conduct of elected officials.
If true, the Board of Selectmen would be well advised to immediately pull back on the
reins of any member who has (as a result of ignorance or stupidity) “wandered off the
reservation.”
Hudson’s recent history with regard to the purchase and / or use of private or state-owned
property has been dismal.
Besides, Hudson already owns the land required to address and resolve the “central”
fire station and Town Hall challenge.
The solution?
In its simplest terms:
---> Once the new library is up and running, Town Hall operations
move into a “campus” consisting of the present library building
and the two adjacent, town-owned properties on Ferry Street.
---> The property presently occupied by the “central” fire station
and Town Hall becomes the site of a new “central station / Fire Department complex.
And yes, I fully realize that the “devil is in the details.” But then, dealing with
harsh reality is what our elected officials signed on for when they asked for our votes.
It is time for our town officials to stop their endless pontification and get serious
about the real issues that confront and will confront our community in the coming decades.
Now more than ever, Hudson needs its officials to display a degree of imagination,
creativity and a willingness to work hard and make difficult decisions. Any town official
demonstrating that he or she is not up to the task should step aside, soonest.
To paraphrase JFK, “no longer can the comfort of opinion serve as a refuge for those
wishing to avoid the discomfort of thought.”
Will the above solution result in a significant and long-term financial commitment by
the town? Of course it will.
But, the reality we must all accept is what might best be referred to as the “FRAM
Oil Filter decision matrix” which simply states, “pay me now or pay me [more] later.”
Political expediency and posturing has resulted in too many public safety projects
having been put on the back burner for too many years now.
Inaction by town officials and continued indifference to the well-being of our community
will have a catastrophic impact on the citizens of Hudson - both their quality of
life and their safety.
One final thought dear friends. It's summer...and town affairs may well be the last
thing on anyone's mind.
But, unless we want to come face to face with some nasty surprises after Labor Day,
we would all be well advised to get informed and get involved...from this moment on.
Best regards to you and yours,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 6/5/2008
Dear Friends,
Tim Quinn, a member of Hudson’s Conservation Commission since Feb 2003, recently
submitted his letter of resignation to the Board of Selectmen, effective immediately.
Given the voluntary nature of citizen public service, the departure of any
official - be they elected or appointed - certainly falls within the normal
course of events, in any town.
You may have noted that on occasion I have been critical with regard to the
performance of some town officials (both on the collective and individual levels).
This has never been the case with regard to Tim and the manner in which he has
carried out his duties and fulfilled his responsibilities as a town official.
Tim’s selfless dedication and unparalleled commitment to our community over the
years - especially, with regard to conservation and land use issues - epitomizes
all the best elements of and just what it means to be a “citizen public servant.”
In an arena which often displays and succumbs to an over-abundance of self-
righteous hubris, Tim consistently demonstrated a rational and thoughtful approach
when addressing the conservation issues facing our community. Tim could always be
trusted and counted upon to do what he truly believed to be in Hudson's best interest.
Tim's leadership set the standard - Tim's integrity was the standard.
His departure from the “official” scene leaves a void which, while not impossible,
will most assuredly be difficult to fill.
We can only hope that someone reading this will consider coming forward to take
Tim’s place on the Conservation Commission to continue his work on behalf of the
Hudson community and its future.
To Tim, our sincere thanks for all his hard work, many years of outstanding service
and a job well done - warmest best wishes for the future.
Bill
Message from Bill Cole 5/18/2008
Dear Friends,
I returned to the states last Wednesday from a business trip to Azerbaijan.
After unpacking and catching up on family happenings while I was away, I was
able to watch a good portion of the Planning Board's meeting on TV.
And there on the screen, as unfortunately expected, the Green Meadow Golf
Course, Inc was making yet another "non-presentation" concerning the
development of the Green Meadow property.
As mentioned, I had just returned from Azerbaijan. And, although I freely
admit to having no linguistic skill, whatsoever, in the Azeri language
I must, in all honesty, say that I would have a better understanding of a
Baku street vendor's "hawking of his wares" than anything I heard that night
either from the Green Meadow representative (Jay Leonard) or the Planning Board.
With all due respect to Mr. Leonard, his is a position with which I can
relate. Over the course of my professional career - both in the public
and private sectors - I have on more than one occasion been called upon
to attempt the making (by way of a presentation) of a "silk purse out of
a sow's ear."
I can truly empathize with his plight: trying to sell the public on a
"something" that does not actually exist...and a "something" that the
public has already made painfully clear it would not consider buying even
if it did exist.
As for the Planning Board - yet another affirmation (as if one were needed)
that it considers "being enamored with its own collective voice" the only
skill set required of public officials.
As some of you may recall, following a W/S presentation concerning the
development of the Green Meadow property several years ago, I employed a
"sports writer" analogy in my assessment of the presentation.
At that time a number of "grocery clerks" posing as town officials -
committed to removing me from the Planning Board - portrayed this analogy
as a threat against "Mom, apple pie and, a land owner's right to do anything
at all with his/her property...regardless of any negative impact on the
community, as a whole.
...at least they got 1 out of 3 correct.
If I may, please allow me to insert a "sport's" element into last Wednesday's
presentation - but more importantly, its application in the future.
There is, I believe, in the "purely for fun" arena of amateur baseball
something referred to as the "Mercy Rule."
As I understand it, if the disparity between two teams becomes embarrassingly
apparent (for example, one team falls behind by 10 or more runs) the umpire
may invoke the "Mercy Rule" to bring the game to a predictable conclusion...
only sooner rather than later.
Given that - by any objective standard - the Green Meadow "team" is down
at least 10 runs...and counting.
And given that the continued waste of taxpayer funds on a "non-project"
(yes dear friends, the town planner and traffic consultant, VHB, are still
costing you and me money) is irresponsible and disdainful of the public's
trust.
Is it too much to hope for that at least one of our public officials would,
at long last, have the intelligence and courage to come forward and invoke
Hudson's version of the "Mercy Rule."
Probably...but, one can hope!
With best regards to you and yours,
Bill
Response to Bill (5/18/2008)
In a message dated 5/18/2008 5:01:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
bcfairway@msn.com writes:
And given that the continued waste of taxpayer funds on a "non-project"
(yes dear friends, the town planner and traffic consultant, VHB, are still
costing you and me money) is irresponsible and disdainful of the public's
trust.
You read my mind Bill. You forgot to mention attorney Buckley, whom no
doubt is costing a few hundred dollars per hour!
It's sort of comical at this point. PB not really having a clue how to deal
with the situation and being asked to be the "applicant" now to get state's
permission to "access" the highway. Then you have atty Leonard doing whatever
he has to (perhaps juggling next) to stay on the agenda so as to not be re-zoned.
Meanwhile, the economy including the retail sector tanks. You really can't make
this stuff up!
On a brighter note, I got my new clubs last week....
Have a great week everyone.
Ed T.
Message from Bill Cole 3/19/2008
Dear Friends,
As a postscript to last week's town elections, the defeat of Article 6 (Senior Center Addition)
serves as yet another "reality check" for Hudson's seniors.
So as to put to rest any suggestion that I may be addressing an issue for which I am not
qualified to discuss, may I offer the following:
* having managed to make it to the age of 64, I assume I qualify (age-wise, anyway)
as a "senior" in today's AARP-centric America, and…
* having been involved with the senior center "Gordian Knot" off and on since the
early 1990s, I am painfully familiar with its history and all the players...on both sides of the issue
One point of clarification:
I am certain that most of you reading this are not aware that when the term "senior" is used
(as in "senior center") it is not referring to ALL the senior citizens of our community, but
rather to a very small number of individuals who belong to a "private" organization which I
believe now calls itself the Council on Aging.
This distinction is not made in a negative context, but rather simply to point out a salient
fact not always apparent when the subject of "seniors" comes up.
Now, back to the last week's election...and the message it sent
From my perspective, there are a number of "realities" that ALL seniors need to once again
accept:
1. They have often been their "own worst enemy.
The senior community’s inability or unwillingness to come together and work for a common goal has,
on more than one occasion over the years, prevented any meaningful progress.
2. They have to - once and for all - stop putting their faith in "hack politicians"
(both local and state-level) who promise anything to get the “senior” vote at election time…only
to turn their backs after the votes have been counted.
3. They also have to avoid - like the proverbial “plague” - Hudson’s home grown
“shysters” and “rainmakers” who have promised the “seniors” the world, but bailed out the minute
they realized some “heavy lifting” was required.
4. They need to admit that the “committee” approach - and the endless pontification and
posturing it encourages - has not and will never contribute to the resolution of issues
facing our senior community.
5. Their only hope is to find a leader, and invest in that individual the authority
to represent them and speak on their behalf…in all matters pertaining to the well being of our
senior community.
There’s nothing magical about the above - just my humble thoughts.
But, if the senior community chooses to remain disconnected from observable reality…continued
failure is guaranteed.
And make no mistake my friends, their failure impacts the future of our entire community and
its citizens...of all ages.
As always, my warmest wishes to you and yours - especially, during this joyous and blessed
time of year.
With best regards,
Bill
Response to Bill from Ed Lenzi (3/19/2008)
Hi Bill,
I just want to address some other results to the election. I am going out on a limb
here to say that I think the border line recession that we are on the verge of or in
my opinion have been in for the past 5 months, has not set in to the residents of Hudson.
Maybe the residents of Hudson are resilient to the increased oil prices and the decline
of the stock market and the decrease in economic wealth across our nation.
I for one have always voted yes on salary increases for teachers and other local agencies,
but folks, lets face it, it should be relative. I mean when the economy is in good
standing and the average citizen is receiving salary increases in there line of work
or from there employer then they should share the same cost of living across the board
with local government as well. When the economy is in a "possible" recession? The following
is only an educated assumption:
--> Oil prices are doubled
--> Most are losing in the stock market
--> Most are conservatively NOT spending
--> Most are not getting salary increases from their employers - possibility getting laid off?
--> Most are concerned with increased taxes
--> It's an election year
--> Largest deficit ever
--> Value of our dollar is at an all time low
--> Our children and grandchildren will be paying for our war
(good luck getting them in their own home), we surely are not! ETC! ETC!
So were do we stand? The country is in need of some major change. We have some history in the
making ( BIG HISTORY ). So getting to the point the residents of hudson must be doing financially
well to vote in salary increases across the board not to mention spending in several other areas.
I don't foresee my taxes going down in the near future or ever, but if the voters of Hudson keep
on voting in spending increases, the taxes will therefore increase. Do we really or can we really
afford higher taxes right now? I just hope the Residents who did not vote will get out and vote
at the next election. I am willing to believe that the folks who are directly related to those
jobs were at the booth casting their vote. Good for them. It shows that if you get out and vote
the majority will prevail.
I don't know if any of you share the same view on this subject as I do, and if not please don't
take offense. Again I am always in favor for increases for anyone when the rest of society is
getting increases. I do not believe that there is any individual that believes that one should
use their tax money to give someone else a salary increase when we are all at risk of financial
instability during these tough times. Picture this; if you owned a business and had employees and
you gave them a raise every year but you yourself as the owner have not taken a raise, that is what
I think is happening here.
best of luck to all in the tough times ahead.
Concerned
Ed Lenzi
Message from Bill Cole 3/7/2008
Dear Friends,
My e-mails to you have and will continue to have as their goal (1) to provide information
and, (2) to pass along, from time-to-time, my thoughts on "development & land use" issues
facing our community.
This e-mail has the same stated goal...but, from a somewhat different but no less important,
perspective.
First, the information - actually, a reminder: Tuesday, March 11th is the "election"
portion of this year's Town
Meeting.
I believe the polls (Hudson Community Center) will be
open from 7 AM to 8 PM
Now for the "thought" - while there are a number of town positions to be voted upon this
year, the most significant position (by any objective measurement), and the one with the
greatest potential for long-term impact upon the entire Hudson community is that of Town
Clerk/ Tax Collector.
The ability of this office to function effectively, day in and day out, is absolutely critical
to the community's well-being, both from the obvious financial point of view and the overall
quality of life enjoyed by all our citizens.
Fortunately, we have a truly outstanding individual on the ballot: Patti Barry
Since being appointed by the Board of Selectman in July of '07 to fill the vacancy created
by the retirement of Cecile Nichols (Hudson's Tax Collector/Town Clerk since the late 1980s),
Patti has consistently demonstrated the unique combination of professionalism, subject matter
expertise and experience, initiative and temperament required in such a position of public
trust.
Without reservation, I support Patti Barry for the position of Hudson Town Clerk/Tax Collector.
I sincerely hope that each of you will join with me to ensure that the Hudson continues to
benefit from Patti's leadership, dedication and commitment to our community.
As always, I truly hope this finds each of you well.
With best regards,
Bill
Message from Bill Cole
Dear Friends,
Recently, during a trans-Atlantic flight back to the States, the phrase “wetlands impact”
suddenly popped into my mind. It never ceases to amaze me just what the brain can conjure
up…at 41,000 ft…in the middle of a 10-hour plane ride - but, that’s a story for another
time.
Since “wetlands impact” had (at least for the time being) taken up residence in my mind
and with nothing much else to do I gave the phrase my undivided attention.
What I came away with - or at least what I recall coming away with - is this:
The phrase is more often than not uttered by developers or their representatives as
it relates to a project being proposed to various Land Use Boards (Planning, Conservation,
ZBA, etc.) - as such, the phrase is more often than not worked into an endless variety of
[seemingly user-friendly] statements:
“…the wetlands impact will be negligible”
“…the wetlands impact will be less than initially proposed”
“…the wetlands impact will be limited to a fraction of the total area designated as
wetlands”
“…etc.”
“…etc.”
2. As history has painfully confirmed, statements such as the above have
one (and only one) purpose: to soothe the conscience of Board members while at the
same time lulling the public into a false sense of comfort.
3. To "sell" the public on the belief that a wetlands impact will be limited
only to the area actually being disturbed (another example of benign wordspeak) is
the bread and butter of every paid "snake-oil salesman".
4. To "ignore" the impact not only to the entire wetlands area under
consideration, but also to other (geographically removed) elements of a community's
eco-system is the act of a fool or someone having little or no regard for the
community's well being.
So my friends, the next time some "subject matter expert" begins walking you down
the Yellow Brick Road with soothing words and comforting guarantees - take a moment
...go behind the curtain... and see just who is playing "Wizard" to Hudson's "Dorothy."
As always, I truly hope this finds all well with you and yours.
With best regards,
Thank you ........... Bill